Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Delhi High Court Case Commentaries

Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020

Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020 Introduction In a consolidated judgment...
Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)

Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)...
Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups/MSMEs: Delhi High Court’s Direction to CBIC and 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty

Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups/MSMEs: Delhi High Court’s Direction to CBIC and 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups and MSMEs: Delhi High Court Orders 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty and Calls CBIC to Frame MSME‑Friendly SOPs Case: Mitraj Business Private...
Comparable-Net-Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses: Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh (2025 DHC 7596)

Comparable-Net-Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses: Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh (2025 DHC 7596)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Comparable‑Net‑Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh, 2025 DHC 7596 (Delhi High Court, 1...
Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583)

Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583) Court: Delhi High Court | Bench: Justice Girish...
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge Introduction In Yash Mishra v. State of...
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: A Detailed Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr. (2025 DHC 7371)...
Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. NIA (2025 DHC 7313-DB)

Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. NIA (2025 DHC 7313-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. National Investigation Agency 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s division bench in...
Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights – Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (2025 DHC 7098-DB)

Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights – Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (2025 DHC 7098-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights (Comprehensive Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (Deceased) through LRs., 2025 DHC 7098-DB) Introduction The Division...
Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes

Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes 1. Introduction Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Ram Kumar (M/s Dr. Kumars...
Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd.

Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd.

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd. 1. Introduction On 22 August 2025, the Delhi High Court...
“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners as Criminal Contempt” – A Commentary on Court on its Own Motion v. Obsession Naaz & Ors. (2025 DHC 7206-DB)

“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners as Criminal Contempt” – A Commentary on Court on its Own Motion v. Obsession Naaz & Ors. (2025 DHC 7206-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners Constitutes Criminal Contempt”: Delhi High Court crystallises the ‘Knowledge-Plus-Obstruction’ Test 1. Introduction In Court on its Own Motion v....
Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j)

Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j)

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j) Introduction On 25 August 2025, the Delhi High Court delivered a cluster...
No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel

No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel

Date: Aug 22, 2025
No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel Introduction In Chand Mehra v. Union of India &...
Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Delhi High Court Recognizes Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later

Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Delhi High Court Recognizes Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later Commentary on GEETA SHARMA v....
Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses in Praveen @ Lallu v. State (2025)

Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses in Praveen @ Lallu v. State (2025)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses Introduction The...

      Delhi High Court on Internet-Based Territorial Jurisdiction and Co‑registered Marks: Aggregator Listings and Passive Websites Don’t Confer Jurisdiction; “Doctor” Held Non‑Distinctive for Disinfectants

Delhi High Court on Internet-Based Territorial Jurisdiction and Co‑registered Marks: Aggregator Listings and Passive Websites Don’t Confer Jurisdiction; “Doctor” Held Non‑Distinctive for Disinfectants

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Internet Listings Don’t Create Jurisdiction; Co‑Registration Bars Infringement: The Delhi High Court’s Roadmap for Online IP Suits and Composite Marks Introduction In Vikrant Chemico Industries Pvt...
Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise:
Delhi High Court Affirms MCD’s Exclusive Authority to Alter Land-Use Consistent with the Master Plan

Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise: Delhi High Court Affirms MCD’s Exclusive Authority to Alter Land-Use Consistent with the Master Plan

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise: Mohit Goel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2025 DHC 6992) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Mohit Goel and...
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas 1. Introduction In Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. v. GAIL (India)...
Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Pre‑Bid Challenges Mandatory for PAC Tenders: Delhi High Court Clarifies Locus and Timelines for Judicial Review in Public Procurement Case: Rotoffset Corporation v. Security Printing and Minting...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert